Karl Jaspers and Seung Sahn Essay -- Compare Contrast Philosophy Essay

Karl Jaspers and Seung Sahn In this paper I will make an examination between the musings of Karl Jaspers and Korean Zen ace Seung Sahn on the idea of awareness and greatness. The expositions being referred to by Jaspers are his articles â€Å"On the Origin of My Philosophy,† written in 1941, and his talks on the noteworthiness of Kierkegaard and Nietzsche and â€Å"the Encompassing,† given in 1935 (p. 158). The other content being contemplated is The Compass of Zen, a gathering of Seung Sahn’s addresses on the three primary parts of Buddhism. The Compass of Zen was started during the 1960s as a fundamental book to clarify the â€Å"bone,† or normal quintessence, of Buddhism to Sahn’s Zen understudies. The 1960s acquired a sharp ascent on intrigue Buddhism among Americans, and The Compass of Zen is frequently utilized as a preliminary to assist Westerners with understanding its lessons. In this manner, Sahn has joined lessons from all over Asia (the three fundamental parts of H inayana, Mahayana, and Zen Buddhism) into one content. Jasper’s theory is also founded on the longing for a â€Å"universal recorded view.† He thought about the three fundamental wellsprings of philosophical idea to be India, the Orient, and the Western custom start with the Greeks. He composes that it is essential to comprehend various kinds of methods of reasoning since they all spring from the fundamental human want for comprehension. As he writes in Kaufmann’s compilation, â€Å"there is more than one well known fact in man.† Both Jaspers and Sahn are attempting to make a generally pertinent way of thinking of internal reflection (contemplation) to pick up amazing quality (illumination, nirvana, moshka, satori); in down to earth terms, inward harmony. Jaspers’ theory is situated in the possibility that way of thinking is demolished by endeavors to place it into ... ... referenced in Jaspers, it is conspicuous in the considering both Bergman and Camus.) As should be obvious, the ways of thinking of Jaspers and Seung Sahn concede to huge numbers of a similar basic focuses, especially on the structure and starting point of cognizance. Where the two vary is in inquiries of procedure. Jaspers needs to extend the restrictions of thought to discover amazing quality, while Buddhism (especially Zen) attempts to go to a spot past idea, before thought, and believes it best to do this by not thinking. Works Cited Jaspers, Karl. â€Å"On the Origin of My Philosophy,† â€Å"Kierkegaard and Nietzsche, â€Å"The Encompassing.† Existentialism from Dostoyevsky to Sartre. Ed. Walter Kaufmann. New York: Plume, 2004. p.158-232. Sahn, Zen Master Seung. The Compass of Zen. Boston: Shambhala, 1997. Tzu, Lao. Tao Te Ching. Trans. David Hinton. Washington, DC: Counterpoint, 2002.